Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,742

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Statistical Models in S

Chambers, J., Hastie, T., Pregibon, D.·1990·Compstat

Abstract

The interactive data analysis and graphics language S (Becker, Chambers and Wilks, 1988) has become a popular environment for both data analysts and research statisticians. A common complaint, however, has concerned the lack of statistical modeling tools, such as those provided by GLIM© or GENSTAT©. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-50096-1_48

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,742

Metadata

Authors
Chambers, J., Hastie, T., & Pregibon, D.
Venue
Compstat
Published
1990
Pages
317-321
OpenAlex
W2010295655
Cited by
1,742
References
0
FWCI
16.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Models in S. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-50096-1_48
The paper
Chambers, J., Hastie, T., & Pregibon, D. (1990). Statistical Models in S. Compstat. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50096-1_48

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.