The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Quantum information and relativity theory
Peres, A., & Terno, D. R. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.93 · Cited by 699
Quantum theory as a universal physical theory
Deutsch, D. (1985) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf00670071 · Cited by 385
Eine wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretische Begr�ndung und Interpretation der Quantenmechanik
F�nyes, I. (1952) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01338578 · Cited by 310
Quantum-like modeling of cognition
Khrennikov, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2015.00077 · Cited by 91
Explaining Length Bias in LLM-Based Preference Evaluations
Hu, Z., Song, L., Zhang, J., Xiao, Z., Wang, T., Chen, Z., Yuan, N. J., Lian, J., Ding, K., & Xiong, H. (2025) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025 · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.358 · Cited by 4
“We draw on classical information theory, where entropy measures the uncertainty or information content of a message (Von Neumann, 1932).”
Metadata
- Authors
- von Neumann, J.
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1996
- OpenAlex
- W2115998098
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- book
- Language
- de
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-61409-5
- The paper
- von Neumann, J. (1996). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61409-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
