The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pseudopupils of Compound Eyes
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. I. Retina-lamina projections
Braitenberg, V. (1967) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235589 · Cited by 432
Cited by
Detection of coloured stimuli by honeybees: minimum visual angles and receptor specific contrasts
Giurfa, M., Vorobyev, M., Kevan, P., & Menzel, R. (1996) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00227381 · Cited by 396
Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio
Arikawa, K. (2003) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0454-7 · Cited by 155
“The color of the purple pigment of R1 and R2 is not observed this way, as it probably serves as a light-controlling, pupillary pigment (Stavenga 1979), although experiments to prove this have not been reported so far.”
Williams, D. S. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00609577 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Stavenga, D. G.
- Venue
- Handbook of Sensory Physiology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1979
- Pages
- 357-439
- ISSN
- 0072-9906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W143564598
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pseudopupils of Compound Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-66999-6_7
- The paper
- Stavenga, D. G. (1979). Pseudopupils of Compound Eyes. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-66999-6_7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
