The effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine
Abstract
Caffeine is eliminated mainly by metabolism to demethylated and oxidised derivatives. High individual variability is therefore expected from variations and changes in the capability of the organism to metabolize xenobiotics. An increase of the half-life of elimination of caffeine has been reported during the final weeks of pregnancy. In this study, the half-lifes of caffeine were determined by HPLC-analysis of samples of saliva in male and non-pregnant females and in women during pregnancy and after parturition. The half-life of caffeine increases from an average of 3 h for non-pregnant women to 10.5 h during the last 4 weeks of pregnancy. This increase is already occurring during the first part of pregnancy. The individual values could not be correlated with age, weight, consumption of coffee or smoking habits. An increase of the apparent volume of distribution can also be ruled out as an explanation for the marked increase of the half-life. The main effect of a prolonged half-life is the accumulation of caffeine in the body, unless the consumption is reduced appropriately. Thus, the greatly increased half-life of caffeine during pregnancy could produce adverse effects at a consumption which although considered as high is not excessive under normal conditions. This possibly explains the observation that heavy coffee drinking during pregnancy is linked to a low birthweight in the neonate. Due to the non-specificity of some of the symptoms of caffeine toxicity, pregnant women with such symptoms might be unable to trace the reason for their discomfort if they are not instructed by their physician about the higher susceptibility to caffeine during pregnancy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced caffeine metabolism in the fetus results in a longer half-life and increased caffeine exposure to the fetus.
“This reduced caffeine metabolism results in a longer half-life and increased caffeine exposure to the fetus (141, 167).”
From The Safety of Ingested Caffeine: A Comprehensive Review (2017) · cites this paper as [167]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 1 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Knutti, R., Rothweiler, H., & Schlatter, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- ORCID
- Schlatter, C.
- Venue
- Archives of Toxicology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1982
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 187-192
- ISSN
- 0171-9750 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3113195202
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Archives of toxicology. Supplement (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- caffeine, pregnancy, pharmacokinetics, caffeine half-life, caffeine metabolism, coffee consumption, low birth weight, caffeine toxicity, volume of distribution
- MeSH terms
- Caffeine, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Kinetics, Male, Pregnancy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review