Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Measurement of Visual Motion

Ullman, S., Hildreth, E. C.·1985·Springer Series in Information Sciences

Abstract

The analysis of visual motion plays a central role in biological systems. Sophisticated mechanisms for extracting and utilizing motion exist even in simple animals. For example, the frog has efficient ”bug detection” mechanisms that respond selectively to small, dark objects moving in its visual field [1]. The ordinary housefly can track moving objects and discover the relative motion between a target and its background, even when the two are indistinguishable in the absence of relative motion [2].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-68888-1_11

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Ullman, S., & Hildreth, E. C.
Venue
Springer Series in Information Sciences
Published
1985
Pages
154-176
ISSN
0720-678X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075611125
Cited by
553
References
53
FWCI
41.62
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Measurement of Visual Motion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-3-642-68888-1_11
The paper
Ullman, S., & Hildreth, E. C. (1985). The Measurement of Visual Motion. Springer Series in Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-68888-1_11

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.