Coefficient of Variation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sensitivity of each method to different orders was evaluated by Coefficient of Variation (CV).
“Besides, we further evaluate the sensitivity of each method to different orders by Coefficient of Variation (CV) [57].”
From What Makes Good In-Context Demonstrations for Code Intelligence Tasks with LLMs? (2023) · cites this paper as [57]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khodayari, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13806 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
What Makes Good In-Context Demonstrations for Code Intelligence Tasks with LLMs?
Gao, S., Wen, X.-C., Gao, C., Wang, W., Zhang, H., & Lyu, M. R. (2023) · 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE) · doi:10.1109/ase56229.2023.00109 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, C. E.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Charles E.
- Venue
- Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1998
- Pages
- 155-157
- OpenAlex
- W2226402862
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- coefficient of variation, relative dispersion, standard deviation, ratio scale, geoscience data, measurement precision, control limits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review