Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 14Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

General Sensory Physiology, Psychophysics

Dudel, J.·1986·Fundamentals of Sensory Physiology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-82598-9_1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Marks, L. E.: Sensory Processes. New York — London: Academic Press 1974
  2. Stevens, S. S.: Psychophysics. New York — London — Sidney — Toronto: John Wiley 1975.

Cited by

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Dudel, J.
Venue
Fundamentals of Sensory Physiology
Published
1986
Pages
1-29
OpenAlex
W1491597180
Cited by
14
References
7
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.43
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
psychophysics, sensory perception, subjectivity, sensory deprivation, sensation, perception, philosophy of perception, sense organs, central nervous system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.