CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 51

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Timing of Terra Preta Formation in the Central Amazon: Archaeological Data from Three Sites

Neves, Eduardo Goés, Petersen, James B., Bartone, Robert N., Heckenberger, Michael J.·2004·Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-05683-7_9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-662-05683-7_9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most recorded dates from terra pretas are from 1000 to 2000 years ago.

    “Most recorded dates are from 1000 to 2000 years ago [22]”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Dates from terra pretas are not always contemporaneous, and range from 3000 to 500 years ago.

    “Dates from terra pretas are not always contemporaneous, and range from 3000 to 500 years ago.”

    From Predicting pre-columbian anthropogenic soils in amazonia (2014) · cites this paper as [22]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. AbŚaber A (1996) Paleoclima e paleoecologia da Amazônia Brasileira. In: A Amazônia: Do discurso à praxis. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, pp 49–66
  2. Denevan WM (1996) A bluff model of riverine settlement in prehistoric Amazonia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 86(4):654–681 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Heckenberger M (1996) War and peace in the shadow of empire: sociopolitical change in the Upper Xingu of southeastern Amazonia, A.D. 1400–2000. PhD Diss, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh
  4. Heckenberger MJ, Petersen JB, Neves EG (1999) Village size and permanence in Amazonia: two archaeological examples from Brazil. Latin Am Antiq 10(4):533–576 · DOI
  5. Hilbert PP (1968) Archäologische untersuchungen am Mittlern Amazonas: Beiträge zur vorgeschichte des südamerikanischen tieflandes. Dietrich Reimer, Berlin
  6. Lathrap DW (1970) The Upper Amazon. Thames and Hudson, London
  7. Neves EG (1998) Paths in dark waters: archaeology as indigenous history in the Upper Rio Negro Basin, northwest Amazon. PhD Diss, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University
  8. Neves EG (2000) Levantamento arqueológico da área de confluência dos rios Negro e Solimões, Estado do Amazonas, relatório de atividades Junho 1999-Agosto 2000. Report submitted to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
  9. Neves EG (2001) Indigenous historical trajectories in the Upper Rio Negro Basin. In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves EG (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. British Museum Press, London, pp 266–286
  10. Petersen JB (1996) The archaeology of Trants (Monserrat), Pt. 3. Chronological and settlement data. Ann Carnegie Mus 65:323–361 · DOI
  11. Petersen JB, Neves EG , Heckenberger MJ (2001) Gift from the past: terra preta and prehistoric Amerindian occupation in Amazonia. In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves EG (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. British Museum Press, London, pp 86–105
  12. Smith NJH (1980) Anthrosols and human carrying capacity in Amazonia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 70(4):553–566 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Neves, E. G., Petersen, J. B., Bartone, R. N., & Heckenberger, M. J.
Venue
Amazonian Dark Earths: Explorations in Space and Time
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2004
Pages
125-134
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-05683-7_9
Cited by
51
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review