Phylogenetic Regression for Binary Dependent Variables
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This is good news for those who want to apply models with Gaussian error structure to binomial or count data when models with other structures fail to reach convergence or produce nonsensical estimates.
“This is good news also for those who want to apply models with Gaussian error structure to binomial or count data when models with other structures fail to reach convergence or produce nonsensical estimates (e.g., Ives & Garland, 2014; Plaschke et al., 2019).”
From Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils (2021) · cites this paper as Ives & Garland, 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Ives, A. R., & Garland, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ives, Anthony R.
- Venue
- Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 231-261
- OpenAlex
- W207291124
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 16.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- phylogenetic regression, binary dependent variables, phylogenetic signal, MCMCglmm, type I error, logistic regression, group size, simulation study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review