Ontogenetic Development of Sound Communication in Fishes
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In other taxa, including birds and fish, acoustic signals are known to develop and change with age.
“In other taxa, including birds and fish, acoustic signals are known to develop and change with age (Catchpole and Slater 2008; Ladich 2015).”
From Roars, Rumbles, and Resonance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Crocodylian Acoustic Signals (2026) · cites this paper as Ladich 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 12
- Authors
- Ladich, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Ladich, Friedrich
- ORCID
- Ladich, Friedrich
- Venue
- Animal Signals and Communication
- Publisher
- Springer Vienna
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 127-148
- ISSN
- 2197-7305 (ISSN-L)
- 2197-7313
- OpenAlex
- W2104089534
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Animal signals and communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Keywords
- ontogeny, vocalizations, auditory sensitivity, juvenile fish, Halobatrachus didactylus, agonistic behavior, dominant frequency, sound pressure level, audiogram, Weberian apparatus, sound spectra
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
