Emerging Methodological Challenges for Educational Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Goodyear (2011) emphasized the need to understand how learning activities are distributed across different contexts.
“Goodyear (2011) emphasized the need to understand how learning activities are distributed across different contexts”
From When Do Learners Study? (2022) · cites this paper as Goodyear (2011)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sher, V., Hatala, M., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2022.6697 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Goodyear, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Goodyear, Peter
- ORCID
- Goodyear, Peter
- Venue
- Methodological Choice and Design
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2010-10-25
- Pages
- 253-266
- OpenAlex
- W95596014
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational theories and practices
- Keywords
- educational research methodology, evidence-informed practice, information overload, data scarcity, knowledge synthesis, ways of knowing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
