Cited by 317Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEducational Assessment and PedagogyReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Inter-item Correlations

Piedmont, Ralph L.·2014·Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Piedmont, R. L.
Affiliations
Loyola University Maryland (US)
Corresponding author
Piedmont, Ralph L.
Venue
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research
Published
2014
Pages
3303-3304
OpenAlex
W4252692149
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
inter-item correlation, Cronbach's alpha, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, item analysis, test items

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review