CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Media Studies and CommunicationMedia and Communication StudiesJournalism and Media Studies

Medialization and Credibility: Paradoxical Effect or (Re)-Stabilization of Boundaries? Epidemiology and Stem Cell Research in the Press

Jung, Arlena·2012·Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myriad analyses across diverse media, locations, times, issues, and topics agree that public-facing science communication about specific scientific findings is often presented within an uncertainty frame via mentions of deficient knowledge, shortcomings of the research, controversy among scientists, and error or probability ranges.

    “Myriad analyses across diverse media, locations, times, issues, and topics agree that public-facing science communication about specific scientific findings is often presented within an uncertainty frame via mentions of deficient knowledge, shortcomings of the research, controversy among scientists, and error or probability ranges (Antilla, 2005;Bailey, Giangola, and Boykoff, 2014;Jung, 2012;Kuha,”

    From A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication (2020) · cites this paper as Jung, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jung, A.
Affiliations
WZB Berlin Social Science Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Jung, Arlena
Venue
Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published
2011-11-11
Pages
107-130
ISSN
0167-2320 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-2085-5_6
OpenAlex
W81949611
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 16 · 2020: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Sociology of the sciences/Sociology of the sciences yearbook (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
medialization, scientific credibility, science in the press, epidemiology, stem cell research, science communication, science and society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review