Structural Violence and Structural Vulnerability Within the Risk Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives for a Social Epidemiology of HIV Risk Among Injection Drug Users and Sex Workers
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 220
- Authors
- Rhodes, T., Wagner, K., Strathdee, S. A., Shannon, K., Davidson, P., & Bourgois, P.
- Affiliations
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rhodes, Tim
- Venue
- Rethinking Social Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2011-09-05
- Pages
- 205-230
- OpenAlex
- W72313846
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 39.95
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
- Keywords
- structural violence, structural vulnerability, HIV risk, social epidemiology, people who inject drugs, sex workers, female sex workers, risk environment, individual-environment interaction, marginalised populations, ethnographic methods, interdisciplinary research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review