Ritual, Virtue, and Human Flourishing: Rites as Bearers of Meaning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When conceived as phenomena ubiquitous in all cultures, rituals can be either good or bad.
“When conceived as phenomena ubiquitous in all cultures, rituals can be either good or bad.”
From “Serve Them with Rituals”: Power and Emotions in the Confucian Parent-Child Relationship (2026) · cites this paper as Engelhardt 2012
Cites
GIRARD, R. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.27 · Cited by 2,049 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Engelhardt, H. T.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Engelhardt, H. Tristram
- Venue
- Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 29-51
- ISSN
- 0928-9518 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W62508224
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Philosophical studies in contemporary culture (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Arts and Performance Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- ritual, virtue, eudaimonia, culture wars, meaning, public space, social roles, performatives, moral life, cultural frameworks, metaphysics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
