Cited by 94Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationCultural Differences and ValuesCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

A Formal Definition of Culture

Open access
Birukou, Aliaksandr, Blanzieri, Enrico, Giorgini, Paolo, Giunchiglia, Fausto·2013·Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-007-5574-1_1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Culture is complex and represents customs (including ceremonies, rituals, myths, legends, traditions, celebrations, foods, symbols, and images), social institutions (political, educational, economic, family, and religious), and achievements of a particular group of people.

    “Culture is complex and represents customs (not just beliefs, but may include ceremonies, rituals, myths, legends, traditions, celebrations, foods, symbols, and images), social institutions (transcend beyond a country, such as political, educational, economic, family, and religious institutions), and achievements of a particular group of people (Birukou et al., 2013).”

    From Exploring AR and VR Tools in Mathematics Education Through Culturally Responsive Pedagogies (2024) · cites this paper as Birukou et al., 2013

    The indexed passages contain IRIS repository metadata and a PDF listing, but no text defining culture. Searches for the listed customs and for social institutions and group achievements returned no relevant passage; the paper's substantive text may be missing from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Birukou, A., Blanzieri, E., Giorgini, P., & Giunchiglia, F.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Blanzieri, Enrico
Venue
Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation
Published
2013
Pages
1-26
ISSN
1871-935X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1512479605
Cited by
94
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in group decision and negotiation/Advances in group decision and negotation (publishedVersion)
  • Unitn Eprints Research (Università Degli Studi di Trento) (acceptedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
Web 2.0, multi-agent systems, globalization, agent societies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review