Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 27Interactive and Immersive DisplaysInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsDesign Education and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supporting Collaboration Ubiquitously: An augmented learning environment for architecture students

Iacucci, Giulio, Wagner, Ina·2003·ECSCW 2003

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_8

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lainer, R. and Wagner I. (1998): ‚Offenes Planen. Erweiterung der Lösungsräume für architektonisches Entwerfen’, Architektur & BauForum, vol. 196, September/October 1998, pp. 327–336.
  2. Wagner I. (2002): ‘Open planning: objets persuasifs et fluidité des pratiques’, in: Proceedings Colloque Architecture des systèmes urbains, Universite de Technologie de Compiègne, July 5, 2001 (forthcoming).

Cited by

See all 27

Metadata

Authors
Iacucci, G., & Wagner, I.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Venue
ECSCW 2003
Published
2003
Pages
139-158
OpenAlex
W2150060497
Cited by
27
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
Keywords
tangible computing, ubiquitous computing, collaboration, architecture students, design education, intermediary space, configurability, ethnographic fieldwork

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.