Cited by 141Dust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaPlanetary Science and ExplorationAstro and Planetary Science

Horizon-Glow and the Motion of Lunar Dust

Criswell, David R.·1973·Astrophysics and Space Science Library

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-010-2647-5_36

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Criswell, D. R.
Affiliations
Lunar and Planetary Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Criswell, David R.
Venue
Astrophysics and Space Science Library
Published
1973
Pages
545-556
ISSN
0067-0057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1494763423
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Astrophysics and space science library (publishedVersion)
  • NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
lunar dust, electrostatic levitation, charged dust particles, solar X-ray emission, lunar regolith

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review