CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceCognitive Computing and Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unified Theories of Cognition and the Role of Soar

Newell, Allen·1992·Studies in Cognitive Systems
DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-2426-3_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-011-2426-3_3

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unified theories of cognition are the only way to bring the increasing fund of knowledge under intellectual control.

    “While domain-specific models have (and will continue to) provide answers to important research questions, we agree with Newell (1992) that 'unified theories of cognition are the only way to bring this wonderful, increasing fund of knowledge under intellectual control.'”

    From Meta-learned models of cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Newell (1992)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1976).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  3. Anderson, J. R. (1990).The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. (1973).Human associative memory. Washington, DC: Winston.
  5. Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983).The psychology of human-computer interaction.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  7. Cho, B., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Dolan, C. P. (1991). Neuro-Soar: A neural-netwotK architecture for goal-oriented behavior. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 673–677). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  8. Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  9. Crowder, R. G. (1982). The demise of short-term memory.Acta Psychologica, 50,291–323. · DOI
  10. Feigenbaum, E. A., & Feldman, J. (Eds.). (1963).Computers and thought.New York: McGraw-Hill.
  11. Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., & Thagard, P. R. (1986).Induction: Processes of inference, learning, and discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · DOI
  12. Hull, C. L. (1943).Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  13. John, B. E. (1988).Contributions to engineering models of human-computer interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  14. John, B. E., & Newell, A. (1987). Predicting the time to recall computer command abbreviations. In J. M. Carroll & P. P. Tanner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1987 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems and Graphics Interface (pp. 33–40). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. · DOI
  15. Kempen, G., & Vosse, T. (1989). Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing.Connection Science, 1,273–290. · DOI
  16. Laird, J., & Newell, A. (1983).A universal weak method([ech. Rep. CMU-CS-83-141).Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Computer Science.
  17. Lewis, R. L., Newell, A., & Polk, T. A. (1989). Toward a Soar theory of taking instructions for immediate reasoning tasks. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 514–521). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. Lehman, J. F., Lewis, R. L., & Newell, A. (1991). Integrating knowledge sources in language comprehension. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 461–466). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63,81–97. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Newell, A. (1990).Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  21. Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In I. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  22. Newell, A., Shaw, I. C., & Simon, H. A. (1959).Report on a general problem-solving program. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing (pp.256–264). Paris: UNESCO House.
  23. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:PrenticeHall.
  24. Polanyi, M. (1958).Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  25. Polk, T. A., & Newell, A. (1988).Modeling human syllogistic reasoning in Soar. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 181–187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  26. Polk, T. A., Newell, A., & Lewis, R. L. (1989). Toward a unified theory of immediate reasoning in Soar.In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 506–513). Hillsdale, NI: Erlbaum.
  27. Ruiz, D., & Newell, A. (1989). Tower-noticing triggers strategy-change in the Tower of Hanoi: A Soar model. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 522–529). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. · DOI
  28. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review, 84,127–190. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Simon, H. A. (1989).Models of thought (Vol. 2). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  31. Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Newell, A.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Newell, Allen
Venue
Studies in Cognitive Systems
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published
1992
Pages
25-79
ISSN
0924-0780 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/978-94-011-2426-3_3
OpenAlex
W1580635587
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.80
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in cognitive systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
unified theory of cognition, SOAR, cognitive architecture, cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review