The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models, and the Gauss—Newton method
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. (1974) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/61.3.439 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., & Huyvaert, K. P. (2011) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6 · Cited by 4,104
Self-citationModel Selection: An Integral Part of Inference
Buckland, S. T., Burnham, K. P., & Augustin, N. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533961 · Cited by 1,717
Self-citationEffects of grazing on grassland soil carbon: a global review
McSherry, M. E., & Ritchie, M. E. (2013) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12144 · Cited by 829
AIC Model Selection in Overdispersed Capture‐Recapture Data
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & White, G. C. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1939637 · Cited by 685
Self-citationAnalysis of frequency count data using the negative binomial distribution
White, G. C., & Bennetts, R. E. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265753 · Cited by 465
Metadata
- Authors
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R.
- Venue
- Wildlife 2001: Populations
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1992
- Pages
- 16-30
- OpenAlex
- W16075917
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_3
- The paper
- Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (1992). Data-Based Selection of an Appropriate Biological Model: The Key to Modern Data Analysis. Wildlife 2001: Populations. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2868-1_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
