Identification of Vegetable Fibres
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The diameters of ultimate fibers are consistent with surveys of Linum fiber widths.
“The diameters of ultimate fibers are consistent with surveys of Linum fiber widths (Catling and Grayson 1982;Garside and Wyeth 2006).”
From Investigating a Dated Piece of the Shroud of Turin (2010) · cites this paper as Catling and Grayson 1982
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 127
- Authors
- Catling, D., & Grayson, J.
- Affiliations
- Metropolitan Police Service (GB)
- Venue
- Springer eBooks
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1982
- OpenAlex
- W1978140983
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 14.10
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
- Keywords
- vegetable fibres, plant identification, microscopic features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
