The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reanalysis in Sentence Processing
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150
The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909600386084 · Cited by 993
Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0752 · Cited by 615
Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/5757 · Cited by 558
Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension
FRAZIER, L., CARLSON, K., & CLIFTONJR, C. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Venue
- Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1998
- ISSN
- 1873-0043 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1601535928
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9
- The paper
- Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. (1998). Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9070-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
