The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Sharedplans
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The idea that efective group work requires an accurate mental model of one's teammates-humans or AI-goes back decades [7,16].”
From Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiative (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Citations
Cites
Shoham, Y. (1992) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(93)90034-9 · Cited by 2,658
Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason.
Velleman, J. D., & Bratman, M. E. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185304 · Cited by 2,415
Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action
Grosz, B., & Kraus, S. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4 · Cited by 1,267
Self-citationProceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017)
Amendola, G., Ricca, F., & Truszczyński, M. (2017) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 1,179
Plans and resource‐bounded practical reasoning
Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., & Pollack, M. E. (1988) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1988.tb00284.x · Cited by 1,137
Bratman, M. (1991) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2185537 · Cited by 998
Gibbs, R. W., Cohen, P. R., Morgan, J. L., & Pollack, M. E. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422946 · Cited by 967
(1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.001.0001 · Cited by 901
Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions
Jennings, N. R. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00020-2 · Cited by 549
Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0022 · Cited by 516
Self-citationDean, T., & Wellman, M. P. (1991) · Cited by 451
Levesque, H. J., Cohen, P. R., & Nunes, J. H. T. (1990) · National Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 433
Russell, S., & Wefald, E. H. (1991) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(91)90015-c · Cited by 364
Optimal composition of real-time systems
Shlomo Zilberstein, B., & Russell, S. (1996) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00074-3 · Cited by 183
Bundy, A., Giunchiglia, F., Sebastiani, R., & Walsh, T. (1996) · Cited by 127
Collaborative Systems (AAAI-94 Presidential Address)
Grosz, B. J. (1996) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v17i2.1223 · Cited by 118
Self-citationCollaborative plans for group activities
Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S. (1993) · Cited by 109
Self-citationModels of plans to support communication: an initial report
Lochbaum, K. E., Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1990) · Cited by 75
Self-citationUsing Collaborative Plans to Model the Intentional Structure of Discourse
Lochbaum, K. E. (1994) · Cited by 71
Reasoning about actions and plans
Georgeff, M., & Lanksy, A. (1986) · Cited by 63
Reasoning About Actions and Plans
Tate, A. (1986) · Cited by 54
The Use of Knowledge Preconditions in Language ProcessingPreprint
Lochbaum, K. E. (1995) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cmp-lg/9508011 · Cited by 36
Representing Plans Under Uncertainty: A Logic of Time, Chance, and Action
Haddawy, P., Carbonell, J., & Siekmann, J. (1994) · Cited by 33
The One-Day Student Conference
Haughey, F. (1997) · Archaeology International · doi:10.5334/ai.0116 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Cecile T. Balkanski. Modelling act-type relations in collaborative activity. Technical Report 23–90, Harvard University, 1990.
- T.L. Dean and M. P. Wellman. Pranning and Control. Morgan Kaufman, Publishers, California, 1991.
- D. Nguyen, S. Hanks, and C. Thomas. The TRUCKWORLD manual. Technical Report TR 93–0908, Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Univ. of Washington, 1993.
- Hanna Pasula. Design of a collaborative planning system. Harvard University, Senior Honors Thesis, 1996.
- C. Rich and C. L. Sidner. Adding a collaborative agent to direct-manipulation interfaces. Technical Report 96–11, Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Cambridge, MA, May 1996.
- S. J. Russell and E. H. Wefald. Principles of meta-reasoning. In Proceedings of the First International Conference of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 400–411, 1989.
- John R. Searle. Collective intentions and actions. In Intentions in Communication, chapter 19. The MIT Press, 1990.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms
Horling, B., & Lesser, V. (2004) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888905000317 · Cited by 709
“…based on the joint intentions framework ( Levesque et al ., 1990), which formally defines how agents should reason over joint commitments and shared goals , and SharedPlans theory ( Grosz & Kraus , 1999), which provides a formal way to encode and reason about joint plans , intentions and beliefs .”
BackgroundMethodReaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation
Kraus, S., Sycara, K., & Evenchik, A. (1998) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00078-2 · Cited by 616
Self-citationBeyond Accuracy: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance
Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Lasecki, W. S., Weld, D. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5285 · Cited by 466
“Early work explored the importance of mental models for achieving high performance in group work (Grosz and Kraus 1999; Mohammed, Ferzandi, and Hamilton 2010), human-system collaboration (Rouse, Cannon-Bowers, and Salas 1992), and interface design (Carroll and Olson 1988).”
BackgroundHealth dialog systems for patients and consumers
Bickmore, T., & Giorgino, T. (2006) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2005.12.004 · Cited by 242
“As an example of a plan-based computational model of discourse, we briefly review the theory developed by Grosz and Sidner [11], later elaborated by Grosz and Kraus and Lochbaum [40,41], and implemented in the COLLAGEN dialog engine [42].”
MethodProperties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
Parsons, S. (2003) · Journal of Logic and Computation · doi:10.1093/logcom/13.3.347 · Cited by 190
“As a result of this requirement, there has been much work on providing agents with the ability to hold such dialogues — for example by Dignum and colleagues [8, 9], Grosz and Kraus [15], Parsons and Jennings [28, 30], Reed [37], Schroeder et al. [40], and Sycara [42].”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Grosz, B. J., & Kraus, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Venue
- Applied Logic Series
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 227-262
- ISSN
- 1386-2790 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1596507639
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 17.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nrs.harvard.edu
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Applied logic series (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Keywords
- agent cooperation, group planning, plan execution, coordination, shared goals, rational agents, multi-agent systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
