The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Pujol, J. M., Delgado, J., Ramon Sangüesa, A., & Flache, A. (2005) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 5,771
Madden, E. H., Goodman, N., & Melsen, A. G. V. (1955) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103789 · Cited by 4,377
Dung, P. M. (1995) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-x · Cited by 4,270
Reiter, R. (1980) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4 · Cited by 3,892
de Kleer, J. (1986) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90080-9 · Cited by 1,736
Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics
Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., & Magidor, M. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90101-5 · Cited by 1,660
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning
Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · Cited by 1,201
Doyle, J. (1979) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(79)90008-0 · Cited by 1,132
Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (vol. 1)
Gabbay, D. M., Hogger, C. J., & Robinson, J. A. (1993) · Oxford University Press eBooks · Cited by 894
Cited by
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
Gordon, T. F., Prakken, H., & Walton, D. (2007) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.010 · Cited by 393
Self-citationCombining explanation and argumentation in dialogue
Bex, F., & Walton, D. (2016) · Argument & Computation · doi:10.3233/aac-160001 · Cited by 53
“A number of computational models of argumentation have emerged and matured in the past twenty-or-so years [20] and the computational aspects of the dialectics of argument and of the structure of argument are well understood (cf.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Prakken, H., & Vreeswijk, G.
- Venue
- Handbook of Philosophical Logic
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 219-318
- OpenAlex
- W1580355372
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 34.21
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3
- The paper
- Prakken, H., & Vreeswijk, G. (2001). Logics for Defeasible Argumentation. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
