Cited by 838Philosophy, History, and HistoriographyPhilosophy and Historical ThoughtPhenomenology and Existential Philosophy

Historical Ontology

Hacking, Ian·2002·In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-017-0475-5_13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hacking, I.
Affiliations
Collège de France (FR)
Corresponding author
Hacking, Ian
Venue
In the Scope of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
Published
2002
Pages
583-600
OpenAlex
W4230780916
Cited by
838
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 28
FWCI
340.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Historical Thought
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Keywords
historical ontology, ontology, metaphysics, coming into being, possibility, being, Christian Wolff, Quine, Martin Heidegger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review