The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations
Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Liew, M. W. V., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., & Veith, T. L. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23153 · Cited by 13,446
A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models: 2000–2020
Tiyasha, Tung, T. M., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2020) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124670 · Cited by 650
Luo, W., Taylor, M. C., & Parker, S. R. (2008) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.1583 · Cited by 273
Novel approach for streamflow forecasting using a hybrid ANFIS-FFA model
Yaseen, Z. M., Ebtehaj, I., Bonakdari, H., Deo, R. C., Danandeh Mehr, A., Mohtar, W. H. M. W., Diop, L., El-shafie, A., & Singh, V. P. (2017) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.007 · Cited by 267
Individual and combined impacts of future climate and land use changes on the water balance
Kundu, S., Khare, D., & Mondal, A. (2017) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.061 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Willmott, C. J.
- Venue
- Spatial Statistics and Models
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 1984
- Pages
- 443-460
- OpenAlex
- W53688207
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8_23
- The paper
- Willmott, C. J. (1984). On the Evaluation of Model Performance in Physical Geography. Spatial Statistics and Models. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8_23
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
