Treatment Resistance in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies indicate individuals with poor insight have lower response to ERP than those with good or fair insight, while other studies fail to find an association.
“Whereas some studies indicate that individuals with poor insight have a lower response to ERP than do those with good or fair insight, other studies fail to find an association between the two.[27]”
From Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and new directions (2019) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 112 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Middleton, R., Wheaton, M. G., Kayser, R., & Simpson, H. B.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Simpson, H. Blair
- Venue
- Treatment Resistance in Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Springer Singapore
- Published
- 2018-10-30
- Pages
- 165-177
- OpenAlex
- W2899365767
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 112
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, treatment resistance, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, cognitive behavioral therapy, exposure and response prevention, pharmacotherapy, combination therapy, treatment-resistant OCD
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
