Cited by 18Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesDesign Education and PracticeAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

A Snapshot of 26 Years of Research on Creativity in Software Engineering - A Systematic Literature Review

Amin, Aamir, Basri, Shuib, Hassan, Mohd Fadzil, Rehman, Mobashar·2018·Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-10-5281-1_47

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Creativity in software engineering is understudied.

    “Understudied [6], creativity in software engineering is at a watershed moment, as the emergence of Generative AI (GenAI) could have a major impact on individuals, employers, and the products they build.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amin, A., Basri, S., Hassan, M. F., & Rehman, M.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (MY)
  • Universiti Teknologi Petronas (MY)
Corresponding author
Amin, Aamir
Venue
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering
Published
2017-06-17
Pages
430-438
ISSN
  • 1876-1100 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-1119
OpenAlex
W2624830825
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in electrical engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
creativity, software engineering, creativity research, requirement engineering, software development phases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review