Effects of Granulated Ground Blast Furnace Slag and Fly Ash on Stabilization of Soil
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Addition of fly ash is one method to stabilize soil because fly ash is a pozzolan that can bind to minerals in soil and make the soil stable.
“The addition of fly ash is one of the methods to stabilize soil because fly ash is a pozzolan, in which it can bind to minerals in soil and make the soil stable”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Mixing GGBFS with soil improves compressive strength, permeability, and durability.
“Mixing GGBFS with soil improves compressive strength, permeability, and durability [39,54,65,66,67,68,69].”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Tyagi et al. found strength value increases as amounts of fly ash and GGBFS reach maximum values of 18% and 30%, respectively.
“The strength value increases as the amounts of fly ash and GGBFS reach their maximum values of 18% and 30%, respectively.”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Addition of fly ash reduces swell shrinkage of soil and improves soil strength.
“so as to reduce the swell shrinkage of the soil and improve soil strength [41,42,44,46,54,69,70,71,72,73].”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
The UCS value for Tyagi et al. does not fulfill ASTM D 4609 (>0.8 MPa).
“However, the unconfined compressive strength value does not fulfill the ASTM D 4609 standard [76], which must be greater than 0.8 MPa.”
From Potential of Soil Stabilization Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS) and Fly Ash via Geopolymerization Method: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [69]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdila, S. R., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Ahmad, R., Burduhos Nergis, D. D., Rahim, S. Z. A., Omar, M. F., Sandu, A. V., Vizureanu, P., & Syafwandi (2022) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma15010375 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tyagi, A., & Soni, D. K.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Tyagi, Arshad
- ORCID
- Soni, D. K.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering
- Publisher
- Springer Singapore
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 79-90
- ISSN
- 2366-2557 (ISSN-L)
- 2366-2565
- OpenAlex
- W2944682120
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Lecture notes in civil engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
- Keywords
- fly ash, soil stabilization, industrial waste utilization, unconfined compressive strength, California bearing ratio, compaction characteristics, optimum moisture content, liquid limit, plastic limit, relative density, maximum dry density, soil strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
