Health Seeking Behaviour: Doctor Shopping
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients tend to visit different hospitals and may repetitively undergo similar HPV genotyping assays because of the relatively lower costs of national health insurance in Korea.
“Meanwhile, patients tend to visit different hospitals and may repetitively undergo similar HPV genotyping assays due to relatively lower costs of national health insurance in Korea [33–35].”
From Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping (2022) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, M., Kim, J., Park, N. J.-Y., & Park, J. Y. (2022) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267836 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ng, F., Smith, G. D., Ma, C. C., & Li, L. W.
- Affiliations
- Saint Francis University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Graeme D.
- Venue
- Primary Care Revisited
- Publisher
- Springer Singapore
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 241-252
- OpenAlex
- W3033082973
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- doctor shopping, health-seeking behavior, polypharmacy, continuity of care, physician-patient relationship, primary care, chronic disease, digital health, consultation fees, waiting time, patient-centered care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review