The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Based Measures of Anxiety
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The ADIS-IV shows adequate psychometric properties and is an excellent interview for assessing anxiety disorders.38”
From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [38]
Citations
Cites
Utilization of psychotherapy research by practicing psychotherapists.
Morrow-Bradley, C., & Elliott, R. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.2.188 · Cited by 307
Practitioner’s Guide to Empirically Based Measures of Depression
Nezu, A. M., Ronan, G. F., Meadows, E. A., McClure, K. S., & Jones, J. V. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.15.4.386 · Cited by 186
Behavior therapy in practice: A national survey of behavior therapists
Swan, G. E., & MacDonald, M. L. (1978) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(78)80010-0 · Cited by 49
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
“This study reports the development and validation of a measure for evaluating the presence and severity of GAD in clinical practice, the GAD-7, one of the few GAD measures that is also specifically linked to the DSM-IV (Text Revision) criteria.(19,26) A score of 10 or greater on the GAD-7 represents a reasonable cut p…”
MethodGrös, D. F., Antony, M. M., Simms, L. J., & McCabe, R. E. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369 · Cited by 615
Self-citationA Meta-Analytic Review of Adult Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Outcome Across the Anxiety Disorders
Norton, P. J., & Price, E. C. (2007) · Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000253843.70149.9a · Cited by 612
“Reported average effect sizes derived only from established measures identified in Antony et al. (2001) for each anxiety diagnosis and are weighted by sample size.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGratz, K. L., & Gunderson, J. G. (2006) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2005.03.002 · Cited by 618
Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech
Cowie, R., & Cornelius, R. R. (2003) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00071-7 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Antony, M. M., Orsillo, S. M., & Roemer, L.
- Affiliations
- St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
- Boston University (US)
- University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
- Venue
- AABT Clinical Assessment Series
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2001
- ISSN
- 1567-8350 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W409377103
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- AABT clinical assessment series (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- anxiety disorders, psychological assessment, anxiety assessment, anxiety disorder treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
