Cited by 97Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFire effects on ecosystemsWater Quality and Resources Studies

Effects of forest fire and drought on acidity of a base-poor boreal forest stream: similarities between climatic warming and acidic precipitation

Bayley, S. E., Schindler, D. W., Parker, B. R., Stainton, M. P., Beaty, K. G.·1992·Biogeochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00004041

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For cations generally, a pattern of general increase occurred across biomes, but not in all cases.

    “For cations generally, this pattern of a general increase occurred across biomes (Bayley et al., 1992; Beche et al., 2005; Betts & Jones, 2009; Bitner et al., 2001; Burke et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2018), but not in all cases.”
  • In cases where the buffering capacity was low, decreases in pH observed in the literature were attributed to acidity from export of reduced sulfur and subsequent oxidation, increased nitrate, application of phosphorus-based fire retardant, and increased DOC that included organic acids.

    “In cases where the buffering capacity was low, decreases in pH observed in the literature were attributed to acidity from export of reduced sulfur and subsequent oxidation (Bayley et al., 1992), increased nitrate (Crilly et al., 2017), application of phosphorus-based fire retardant (Angeler et al., 2004, 2005, 2006) and increased DOC that included organic acids (Bladon et al., 2014).”
  • Elevated sulfate concentrations were most often associated with responses in boreal/peatland region lakes, but elevated sulfate has also been observed in temperate streams.

    “Elevated sulfate concentrations were most often associated with responses in boreal/peatland region lakes (Bayley et al., 1992; Brown et al., 2013; Crilly et al., 2017; Lydersen et al., 2014), but elevated sulfate has also been observed in temperate streams (Beche et al., 2005).”
  • Alkalinity decreases in boreal regions have been attributed both to peatland release of hydrogen ions as well as oxidation of reduced sulfur.

    “and this has been attributed both to peatland release of hydrogen ions as well as oxidation of reduced sulfur (Allen et al., 2003; Bayley et al., 1992; Crilly et al., 2017; Lydersen et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayley, S. E., Schindler, D. W., Parker, B. R., Stainton, M. P., & Beaty, K. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
1992-10
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
191-204
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W2029147382
Cited by
97
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
forest fires, drought, stream acidity, acid neutralizing capacity, base cations, sulfate, chloride, nitrate, stream pH, global warming, acid rain, sulfur loss, peatlands, Experimental Lakes Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review