Cited by 34Fish Ecology and Management StudiesFish biology, ecology, and behaviorFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Populations and production of fish in two small tributaries of the Paran� River, Paran�, Brazil

Agostinho, A. A., Penczak, T.·1995·Hydrobiologia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00015508

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of deforestation on total fish abundance.

    “Previous studies have demonstrated a positive effect of deforestation on total fish abundance (Lenat & Crawford, 1994;Agostinho & Penczak, 1995;Lyons et al., 1995;Harding et al., 1998).”

    From Effects of deforestation on fish community structure in Ecuadorian Amazon streams (2002) · cites this paper as Agostinho & Penczak, 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agostinho, A. A., & Penczak, T.
Affiliations
University of Łódź (PL)
Venue
Hydrobiologia
Published
1995-09
Volume
312
Issue
3
Pages
153-166
ISSN
  • 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5117
OpenAlex
W1969055756
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hydrobiologia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
fish biomass, fish production, Paraná River, habitat factors, hiding places, water depth, water quality, aquatic plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review