Cited by 57Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

A new relationship for rarefaction

Brewer, Andrew, Williamson, Mark·1994·Biodiversity and Conservation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00056509

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, A., & Williamson, M.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Venue
Biodiversity and Conservation
Published
1994-06
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
373-379
ISSN
  • 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9710
OpenAlex
W2136325639
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
rarefaction, diversity indices, sampling effort, species number, sampling without replacement, rarefaction curves, species-area relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review