Global amphibian declines: a perspective from the Caribbean
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ongoing losses of anuran biodiversity on Puerto Rico and other West Indian islands are part of a global amphibian decline that has continued largely unabated since at least the 1970s.
“The ongoing losses of anuran biodiversity on Puerto Rico and other West Indian islands (66, 67) are part of a global amphibian decline that has continued largely unabated since at least the 1970s (68–72).”
From Climate-driven declines in arthropod abundance restructure a rainforest food web (2018) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Blair Hedges, S.
- Venue
- Biodiversity and Conservation
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 290-303
- ISSN
- 0960-3115 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9710
- OpenAlex
- W2129167557
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biodiversity and Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Keywords
- amphibian decline, deforestation, riparian habitat loss, forest cover, extinction risk, charcoal burning, population growth control, Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, Haiti
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
