The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The structure of random utility models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice
Tversky, A. (1972) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0032955 · Cited by 3,365
Cited by
Using Choice Experiments to Value the Environment
Hanley, N., Wright, R. E., & Adamowicz, V. (1998) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1008287310583 · Cited by 1,051
Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya
Fischer, E., & Qaim, M. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018 · Cited by 836
Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments
Bergmann, A., Hanley, N., & Wright, R. (2006) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.035 · Cited by 467
Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R. E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parsisson, D., & Crabtree, B. (1998) · Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x · Cited by 406
Incorporating random constraints in discrete models of choice set generation
Swait, J., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1987) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/0191-2615(87)90009-9 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Manski, C. F.
- Venue
- Theory and Decision
- Published
- 1977-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-254
- ISSN
- 0040-5833 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7187
- OpenAlex
- W2027739325
- Cited by
- 1,724
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The structure of random utility models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00133443
- The paper
- Manski, C. F. (1977). The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00133443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
