The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The routine as achievement
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977) · Language · doi:10.2307/413107 · Cited by 5,150
Self-citation
Cited by
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry
Heritage, J. (1998) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500019990 · Cited by 689
A Competent Speaker Who Can't Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia
GOODWIN, C. (2004) · Journal of Linguistic Anthropology · doi:10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151 · Cited by 342
Schegloff's Texts' as `Billig's Data': A Critical Reply
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1999) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926599010004006 · Cited by 279
Self-citationThe sociology of the local: action and its publics.
Fine, G. A. (2010) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01380.x · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Schegloff, E. A.
- Venue
- Human Studies
- Published
- 1986
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 111-151
- ISSN
- 0163-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-851X
- OpenAlex
- W2061978010
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The routine as achievement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00148124
- The paper
- Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00148124
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
