Cited by 95World Systems and Global TransformationsHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaPolitical Conflict and Governance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Theories of revolution and revolution without theory: The case of Mexico

Goldfrank, Walter L.·1979·Theory and Society

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00158680

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goldfrank, W. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Goldfrank, Walter L.
Venue
Theory and Society
Published
1979
Volume
7
Issue
1-2
Pages
135-165
ISSN
  • 0304-2421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7853
OpenAlex
W2883258826
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 20 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory and Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Systems and Global Transformations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
Keywords
theories of revolution, Mexican Revolution, world-systems theory, crisis of the state, rural rebellion, political transition, class struggle, sociopolitical organization, structural explanations, advanced capitalist societies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review