Cited by 894Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy, Science, and HistoryBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

Mechanisms and the nature of causation

Glennan, StuartS.·1996·Erkenntnis

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00172853

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glennan, S.
Venue
Erkenntnis
Published
1996-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0165-0106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8420
OpenAlex
W2011926036
Cited by
894
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 34
FWCI
19.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Erkenntnis (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons @ Butler University (Butler University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
causality, mechanisms, complex systems, necessity, laws of nature, explanation, generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review