Cited by 13Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

A simple method for measuring glucose utilization of insulin-sensitive tissues by using the brain as a reference

Open access
Namba, Hiroki, Nakagawa, Keiichi, Iyo, Masaomi, Fukushi, Kiyoshi, Irie, Toshiaki·1994·European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

A simple method, without measurement of the plasma input function, to obtain semiquantitative values of glucose utilization in tissues other than the brain with radioactive deoxyglucose is reported. The brain, in which glucose utilization is essentially insensitive to plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, was used as an internal reference. The effects of graded doses of oral glucose loading (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/g body weight) on insulin-sensitive tissues (heart, muscle and fat tissue) were studied in the rat. By using the brain-reference method, dose-dependent increases in glucose utilization were clearly shown in all the insulin-sensitive tissues examined. The method seems to be of value for measurement of glucose utilization using radioactive deoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in the heart or other insulin-sensitive tissues, especially during glucose loading.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00188671

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Raising blood glucose and/or insulin levels increases [18F]FDG uptake in liver, skeletal muscles, and myocardium mainly via GLUT2 and GLUT4.

    “Conversely, raising blood glucose and/or insulin levels increases [18F]FDG uptake in the liver, skeletal muscles, and myocardium mainly via GLUT2 and 4 [1,6,22].”

    From Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 13

Metadata

Authors
Namba, H., Nakagawa, K., Iyo, M., Fukushi, K., & Irie, T.
Affiliations
  • Chiba Cancer Center (JP)
  • Chiba University (JP)
  • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP)
  • National Institute of Radiological Sciences (JP)
Venue
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
1994-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
228-31
ISSN
  • 1619-7070 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-6997
  • 1619-7089
OpenAlex
W2051670674
Cited by
13
References
10
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Keywords
glucose utilization, insulin-sensitive tissues, 2-deoxyglucose, positron emission tomography, glucose load, heart, skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, insulin, plasma glucose
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Animals, Brain, Carbon Radioisotopes, Deoxyglucose, Glucose, Muscles, Myocardium, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review