Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 888

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Networks and the best approximation property

Open access
Girosi, F., Poggio, T.·1990·Biological Cybernetics

Abstract

Networks can be considered as approximation schemes. Multilayer networks of the perceptron type can approximate arbitrarily well continuous functions (Cybenko 1988, 1989; Funahashi 1989; Stinchcombe and White 1989). We prove that networks derived from regularization theory and including Radial Basis Functions (Poggio and Girosi 1989), have a similar property. From the point of view of approximation theory, however, the property of approximating continuous functions arbitrarily well is not sufficient for characterizing good approximation schemes. More critical is the property ofbest approximation. The main result of this paper is that multilayer perceptron networks, of the type used in backpropagation, do not have the best approximation property. For regularization networks (in particular Radial Basis Function networks) we prove existence and uniqueness of best approximation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00195855

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 888

Metadata

Authors
Girosi, F., & Poggio, T.
Venue
Biological Cybernetics
Published
1990-07
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
169-176
ISSN
  • 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0770
OpenAlex
W2007700211
Cited by
888
References
2
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.