Postural dynamics in the standing human
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a mathematical model of the linkage dynamics in upright standing, and to use this model to study output principles for postural control. The standing human was modelled in the sagittal plane as a three-segment linkage. Mechanical disturbances were simulated as forces which could be applied at various points in this linkage. An iterative approach was used to find joint torque combinations which would restore balance within 80 ms of these mechanical disturbances. The model predicted that a specific proportional relationship was necessary between the hip, knee and ankle torques in order for balance to be restored. This proportional relationship was shown to be a function of the model structure, but independent of the location, direction and amplitude of the disturbance. These predictions were tested experimentally. A disturbance apparatus was designed to apply an impulsive force to the subjects. The joint torque responses of the subjects were in quantitative agreement with the predictions of the model. The results suggest that a fixed relationship between joint torques may be required to restore balance, and this fixed relationship may make the task of postural control simpler for the nervous system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Persons with fibromyalgia syndrome have sensory deficits measured with stabilometry despite having a normal clinical neurological exam.
“Recent studies [4,8,34], have found that persons with FMS have sensory deficits, measure with stabilometry, despite have a normal clinical neurological exam.”
From Impaired Balance in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Predictors of the Impact of This Disorder and Balance Confidence (2020) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
Response to sudden torques about ankle in man: myotatic reflex
Gottlieb, G. L., & Agarwal, G. C. (1979) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1979.42.1.91 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peinado-Rubia, A., Osuna-Pérez, M. C., Rodríguez-Almagro, D., Zagalaz-Anula, N., López-Ruiz, M. C., & Lomas-Vega, R. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17093160 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, J. F., Winter, D. A., & Wells, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Venue
- Biological Cybernetics
- Published
- 1990-02
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 309-320
- ISSN
- 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2064415229
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Biological Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
- Keywords
- postural control, standing, mechanical perturbation, impulsive force, sagittal plane, human postural control
- MeSH terms
- Computer Simulation, Humans, Knee Joint, Models, Biological, Posture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review