Cited by 67Pancreatic function and diabetesIon channel regulation and functionIon Transport and Channel Regulation

Ionic mechanisms involved in the regulation of insulin secretion by muscarinic agonists

Bordin, S., Boschero, A.C., Carneiro, E.M., Atwater, I.·1995·The Journal of Membrane Biology

Abstract

The effects of the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-m (oxo-m) on insulin secretion, K(+)-permeability and electrical activity from isolated mouse pancreatic islets were studied. Oxo-m potentiated glucose-induced insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner, saturating at ca. 10 microM. At 11.2 mM glucose, oxo-m (0.1 and 10 microM) had two distinct effects on beta-cell electrical activity. Both concentrations increased the steady-state burst frequency, however, at 10 microM an initial and transient polarization was measured, and the subsequent activity was accompanied by a slight depolarization. The polarizing effect of oxo-m was almost completely suppressed by charybdotoxin (ChTX), a blocker of the large conductance (maxi) [Ca2+]i-activated potassium channel (K(Ca)). In the presence of 11.2 mM glucose, oxo-m (50 microM) provoked a significant and transient increase in the 86Rb efflux from perifused islets. This effect was inhibited by ChTX. ChTX also potentiated oxo-m stimulated insulin secretion in the presence of glucose. Finally, the balance between the polarizing and depolarizing effects of oxo-m was variable in different islets and depended on glucose concentration. Insulin secretion stimulated by oxo-m in the presence of glucose was more closely correlated to the agonist induced increase in burst frequency than to an increase in plateau fraction. We conclude that muscarinic stimulation has at least two effects on beta-cell electrical activity, an initial hyperpolarizatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00207273

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of ACh are mimicked by carbachol and oxotremorine-m, consistent with mediation via muscarinic receptors.

    “These effects of ACh are mimicked by carbachol and oxotremorine-m (oxo-m), consistent with the idea they are mediated via muscarinic receptors (81).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bordin, S., Boschero, A. C., Carneiro, E. M., & Atwater, I.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
The Journal of Membrane Biology
Published
1995-11
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
177-84
ISSN
  • 0022-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1424
OpenAlex
W2035908033
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Membrane Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
insulin secretion, muscarinic agonists, oxotremorine-M, pancreatic beta cells, beta-cell electrical activity, calcium-activated potassium channels, charybdotoxin, intracellular calcium stores, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, potassium permeability, 86Rb efflux, hyperpolarization, depolarization, burst frequency
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Acetylcholine, Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Electric Conductivity, Female, Glucose, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Membrane Potentials, Oxotremorine, Potassium Channels, Muscarinic Agonists, Charybdotoxin, Potassium Channel Blockers, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review