The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nature of protein folding pathways: The classical versus the new view
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nature of folded states of globular proteins
Honeycutt, J. D., & Thirumalai, D. (1992) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360320610 · Cited by 360
Cited by
From Levinthal to pathways to funnels
Dill, K. A., & Chan, H. S. (1997) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0197-10 · Cited by 2,293
Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function
Tsai, C., Kumar, S., Ma, B., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.8.6.1181 · Cited by 648
Folding funnels and binding mechanisms
Ma, B., Kumar, S., Tsai, C.-J., & Nussinov, R. (1999) · Protein Engineering, Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/12.9.713 · Cited by 594
Folding and binding cascades: Dynamic landscapes and population shifts
Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C., Sinha, N., & Nussinov, R. (2000) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.9.1.10 · Cited by 595
The molten globule state of α‐lactalbumin
Kuwajima, K. (1996) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566530 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldwin, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomolecular NMR
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-9
- ISSN
- 0925-2738 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5001
- OpenAlex
- W2054038320
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
