Cited by 89Smoking Behavior and CessationRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Sex differences in nicotine's effects on consummatory behavior and body weight in rats

Grunberg, N.E., Winders, S.E., Popp, K.A.·1987·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Nicotine administration and cessation have greater effects on body weight and eating behavior in female than in male rats. These generalizations are based on studies of body weight and eating behavior for 2-3 week periods before, during, and after nicotine administration. Therefore, the sex differences may reflect differences in sensitivity to nicotine or simply differences in the time course of nicotine's effects. The present research was designed to replicate these previous studies and to examine long-term effects of nicotine cessation on body weight. Nicotine or saline was administered SC to female and male Sprague-Dawley rats for 16 days. Body weight, food consumption, and water consumption were measured before, during, and after nicotine administration. In addition, body weight was measured for 4 months after cessation of nicotine. There was an inverse relationship between nicotine and body weight. Also, there was an inverse relationship between nicotine and general consummatory behavior for females but not for males. The body weight of females that had received nicotine were indistinguishable from controls up to 4 months after cessation of nicotine. The body weight of males that had received 12 mg nicotine per kg per day remained lower than controls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00217067

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nicotine decreases feeding in animal models.

    “nicotine decreases feeding in animal models (Grunberg et al. 1987)”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Grunberg et al. 1987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grunberg, N. E., Winders, S. E., & Popp, K. A.
Affiliations
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
1987-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
221-5
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2048153776
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
Keywords
nicotine, sex differences, body weight, dietary habits, dietary intake, water consumption, nicotine cessation, long-term effects, consummatory behavior, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Drinking, Eating, Female, Male, Nicotine, Rats, Inbred Strains, Sex Factors, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review