Inheritance of Two Independent Isozyme Variants in Soybean Plants Derived from Tissue Culture
Abstract
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants were regenerated via somatic embryogenesis from nine soybean cultivars. Our objective was to identify and characterize genetically novel mutations that would further our understanding of the soybean genome. Variant isozyme patterns were observed in two independent tissue culturederived lines. Genetic analyses were conducted on these two isozyme variants, and they were heritable. No variant isozyme patterns were evident in control (parental) soybean lines. In the cultivar BSR 101, a mutation of Aco2-b (aconitase) to a null allele was detected. The Aco2-bn mutant, Genetic Type T318, had not been previously observed in soybean. In the Chinese cultivar Jilin 3 (PI 427.099), a chlorophyll-deficient plant was identified that also lacked two mitochondrial malate-dehydrogenase (Mdh null) isozyme bands. These two mutant phenotypes, chlorophyll-deficient and Mdh null, were found to cosegregate. The Jilin 3 mutant, Mdh1-n (Ames 1) y20 (Ames 1) Genetic Type T317, was allelic to three chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutants [Mdh1-n (Ames 2) y20 (Ames 2) (T323), Mdh1-n (Ames 3) y20 (Ames 3) (T324), and Mdh1-n (Ames 4) y20 (Ames 4) (T325)] previously identified from a transposon-containing soybean population, and to a chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutant [Mdh1-n (Urbana) y20 (Urbana) k2, Genetic Type T253] which occurred spontaneously in soybean. The recovery of two isozyme variants from progeny of 185 soybean plants regenerated from somatic embry…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Molecular markers have become a cornerstone of somaclonal variation detection.
“In addition to these traditional methods, molecular markers have become a cornerstone of somaclonal variation detection [114].”
From Somaclonal Variation and Clonal Fidelity in Commercial Micropropagation: Challenges and Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [114]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Amberger, L. A., Shoemaker, R. C., & Palmer, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Venue
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Published
- 1992-08
- Volume
- 84-84
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 600-607
- ISSN
- 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2242
- OpenAlex
- W2013051778
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Soybean genetics and cultivation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Keywords
- soybean, somatic embryogenesis, chlorophyll deficiency, allelic mutants, co-segregation, heritability, soybean genome, mutant selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review