Cited by 28Soybean genetics and cultivationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesPlant tissue culture and regeneration

Inheritance of Two Independent Isozyme Variants in Soybean Plants Derived from Tissue Culture

Amberger, L. A., Shoemaker, R. C., Palmer, R. G.·1992·Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Abstract

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants were regenerated via somatic embryogenesis from nine soybean cultivars. Our objective was to identify and characterize genetically novel mutations that would further our understanding of the soybean genome. Variant isozyme patterns were observed in two independent tissue culturederived lines. Genetic analyses were conducted on these two isozyme variants, and they were heritable. No variant isozyme patterns were evident in control (parental) soybean lines. In the cultivar BSR 101, a mutation of Aco2-b (aconitase) to a null allele was detected. The Aco2-bn mutant, Genetic Type T318, had not been previously observed in soybean. In the Chinese cultivar Jilin 3 (PI 427.099), a chlorophyll-deficient plant was identified that also lacked two mitochondrial malate-dehydrogenase (Mdh null) isozyme bands. These two mutant phenotypes, chlorophyll-deficient and Mdh null, were found to cosegregate. The Jilin 3 mutant, Mdh1-n (Ames 1) y20 (Ames 1) Genetic Type T317, was allelic to three chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutants [Mdh1-n (Ames 2) y20 (Ames 2) (T323), Mdh1-n (Ames 3) y20 (Ames 3) (T324), and Mdh1-n (Ames 4) y20 (Ames 4) (T325)] previously identified from a transposon-containing soybean population, and to a chlorophyll-deficient, Mdh1 null mutant [Mdh1-n (Urbana) y20 (Urbana) k2, Genetic Type T253] which occurred spontaneously in soybean. The recovery of two isozyme variants from progeny of 185 soybean plants regenerated from somatic embry…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00224158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 33 · Cited by 28

Authors
Amberger, L. A., Shoemaker, R. C., & Palmer, R. G.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Published
1992-08
Volume
84-84
Issue
5-6
Pages
600-607
ISSN
  • 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2242
OpenAlex
W2013051778
Cited by
28
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theoretical and Applied Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Soybean genetics and cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
Keywords
soybean, somatic embryogenesis, chlorophyll deficiency, allelic mutants, co-segregation, heritability, soybean genome, mutant selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review