Cited by 144Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Morphological changes in the rat neostriatum after unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injections into the nigrostriatal pathway

Ingham, C. A., Hood, S. H., van Maldegem, B., Weenink, A., Arbuthnott, G. W.·1993·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Destruction of the dopamine-containing neurons in the rat substantia nigra results in morphological changes in the striatum which have been characterized at both the light and electron microscopic levels. After a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injection into the medial forebrain bundle, Golgi-impregnated medium-sized spiny neurons in the neostriatum ipsilateral to the injection had a lower density of spines on their dendrites than those on the contralateral side. A similar decrease in spine density was apparent from 12 days until at least 13.5 months after the lesion. A bilateral loss of spines occurred with increasing age regardless of the presence or absence of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. At the ultrastructural level, the general pattern of synaptic input to the Golgi-impregnated medium-sized spiny neurons was similar on both sides of the brain. The most obvious class of afferent boutons contacting these spiny neurons formed prominent asymmetrical synaptic specializations with the heads of the spines. The numbers of asymmetric synaptic profiles counted in random electron micrographs from the striata ipsilateral and contralateral to the lesion were not significantly different from each other. A small but significant increase in the length of asymmetric synaptic specialization profiles was, however, detected in the striata lacking a dopamine input.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00227776

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 144

Authors
Ingham, C. A., Hood, S. H., van Maldegem, B., Weenink, A., & Arbuthnott, G. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
1993-02
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
17-27
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2065366301
Cited by
144
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
neostriatum, 6-hydroxydopamine, nigrostriatal pathway, dopamine depletion, medium spiny neurons, dendritic spines, spine density, asymmetric synapses, synaptic ultrastructure, substantia nigra, medial forebrain bundle, Golgi impregnation
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dendrites, Histocytochemistry, Injections, Male, Neural Pathways, Receptors, Dopamine, Staining and Labeling, Substantia Nigra, Synapses, Oxidopamine, Neostriatum, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review