Morphological changes in the rat neostriatum after unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injections into the nigrostriatal pathway
Abstract
Destruction of the dopamine-containing neurons in the rat substantia nigra results in morphological changes in the striatum which have been characterized at both the light and electron microscopic levels. After a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine injection into the medial forebrain bundle, Golgi-impregnated medium-sized spiny neurons in the neostriatum ipsilateral to the injection had a lower density of spines on their dendrites than those on the contralateral side. A similar decrease in spine density was apparent from 12 days until at least 13.5 months after the lesion. A bilateral loss of spines occurred with increasing age regardless of the presence or absence of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway. At the ultrastructural level, the general pattern of synaptic input to the Golgi-impregnated medium-sized spiny neurons was similar on both sides of the brain. The most obvious class of afferent boutons contacting these spiny neurons formed prominent asymmetrical synaptic specializations with the heads of the spines. The numbers of asymmetric synaptic profiles counted in random electron micrographs from the striata ipsilateral and contralateral to the lesion were not significantly different from each other. A small but significant increase in the length of asymmetric synaptic specialization profiles was, however, detected in the striata lacking a dopamine input.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spine loss occurs predominantly on DA-D2R-containing medium spiny neurons of the indirect pathway, reflecting dysfunction in neurotransmission in this circuitry.
“Spine loss occurs predominantly on DA-D2R-containing MSNs of the indirect pathway, reflecting the dysfunction in neurotransmission in this circuitry 92, 93.”
From Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease (2013) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 144
- Authors
- Ingham, C. A., Hood, S. H., van Maldegem, B., Weenink, A., & Arbuthnott, G. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- ORCID
- Arbuthnott, G. W.
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-27
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W2065366301
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- neostriatum, 6-hydroxydopamine, nigrostriatal pathway, dopamine depletion, medium spiny neurons, dendritic spines, spine density, asymmetric synapses, synaptic ultrastructure, substantia nigra, medial forebrain bundle, Golgi impregnation
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Corpus Striatum, Dendrites, Histocytochemistry, Injections, Male, Neural Pathways, Receptors, Dopamine, Staining and Labeling, Substantia Nigra, Synapses, Oxidopamine, Neostriatum, Rats, Wistar, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review