Cited by 58Ion Transport and Channel RegulationCellular Mechanics and InteractionsIon channel regulation and function

Responses of neurons to extreme osmomechanical stress

Wan, X., Harris, J.A., Morris, C.E.·1995·The Journal of Membrane Biology

Abstract

Neurons are often regarded as fragile cells, easily destroyed by mechanical and osmotic insult. The results presented here demonstrate that this perception needs revision. Using extreme osmotic swelling, we show that molluscan neurons are astonishingly robust. In distilled water, a heterogeneous population of Lymnaea stagnalis CNS neurons swelled to several times their initial volume, yet had a ST50 (survival time for 50% of cells) > 60 min. Cells that were initially bigger survived longer. On return to normal medium, survivors were able, over the next 24 hr, to rearborize. Reversible membrane capacitance changes corresponding to about 0.7 muF/cm2 of apparent surface area accompanied neuronal swelling and shrinking in hypo- and hyperosmotic solutions; reversible changes in cell surface area evidently contributed to the neurons' ability to accommodate hydrostatic pressures then recover. The reversible membrane area/capacitance changes were not dependent on extracellular Ca2+. Neurons were monitored for potassium currents during direct mechanical inflation and during osmotically driven inflation. The latter but not the former stimulus routinely elicited small potassium currents, suggesting that tension increases activate the currents only if additional disruption of the cortex has occurred. Under stress in distilled water, a third of the neurons displayed a quite unexpected behavior: prolonged writhing of peripheral regions of the soma. This suggested that a plasma membrane-lin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00233304

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In all conditions, no axonal breakage was observed after 10 min of exposure, suggesting short-term hypotonic exposure does not cause gross axonal morphological disruption under the conditions tested.

    “In all conditions, no axonal breakage was observed after 10 min of exposure, suggesting that short-term hypotonic exposure does not cause gross axonal morphological disruption under the conditions tested35–37.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, X., Harris, J. A., & Morris, C. E.
Venue
The Journal of Membrane Biology
Published
1995-05
Volume
145
Issue
1
Pages
21-31
ISSN
  • 0022-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1424
OpenAlex
W2075672949
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Membrane Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
osmotic swelling, membrane capacitance, cell surface area, potassium currents, actomyosin, myosin ATPase inhibition, N-ethylmaleimide, neuronal regeneration, osmotic stress tolerance
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Cell Membrane, Cell Survival, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Lymnaea, Membrane Potentials, Neurons, Osmolar Concentration, Stress, Mechanical, Cell Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review