Prevalence of coronary heart disease, left ventricular failure and hypertension in middle-aged, newly diagnosed Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence of coronary heart disease, left ventricular failure and hypertension was examined in a representative group of 133 newly diagnosed Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects (70 men, 63 women), aged 45 to 64 years, and in a group of 144 randomly selected non-diabetic control subjects (62 men, 82 women) of the same age group. The prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (major Q-QS abnormalities in resting ECG and/or myocardial infarction verified at hospital) was increased 1.7-fold in male (NS) and 4.4-fold in female (p = 0.007) diabetic patients compared with that found in non-diabetic subjects. Chest pain symptoms and ischaemic ECG abnormalities were about twice as common among diabetic than among non-diabetic subjects. The frequency of coronary heart disease defined by chest pain symptoms and ECG abnormalities was 3.5 times higher in male (p = 0.001) and 3.1 times higher in female (p = 0.001) diabetic patients than in the respective non-diabetic subjects. The frequency of current digitalis therapy was increased 3.3-fold in male (p = 0.006) and 3.9-fold in female (p = 0.001) diabetic patients suggesting an increased frequency of left ventricular failure among diabetic subjects. The prevalence of hypertension, based on the elevated blood pressure levels and/or current use of antihypertensive drugs, was increased 1.6-1.7-fold among the diabetic patients.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 165
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [23]23. M.D. academic thesis. University of Kuopio 1983
- Authors
- Uusitupa, M., Siitonen, O., Aro, A., & Py�r�l�, K.
- Affiliations
- Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
- ORCID
- Uusitupa, M.
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-27
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2075226613
- Semantic Scholar
- 7b9a009ac2d9a8913d7ed0217c0dcfafa0472958
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Finland
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, left ventricular failure, hypertension, myocardial infarction, chest pain, electrocardiographic abnormalities, digitalis therapy, middle-aged adults, sex differences, cardiovascular comorbidity
- MeSH terms
- Body Weight, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Digitalis Glycosides, Female, Heart Diseases, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review