Cited by 165Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes Treatment and Management

Prevalence of coronary heart disease, left ventricular failure and hypertension in middle-aged, newly diagnosed Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects

Open access
Uusitupa, M., Siitonen, O., Aro, A., Py�r�l�, K.·1985·Diabetologia

Abstract

The prevalence of coronary heart disease, left ventricular failure and hypertension was examined in a representative group of 133 newly diagnosed Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects (70 men, 63 women), aged 45 to 64 years, and in a group of 144 randomly selected non-diabetic control subjects (62 men, 82 women) of the same age group. The prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (major Q-QS abnormalities in resting ECG and/or myocardial infarction verified at hospital) was increased 1.7-fold in male (NS) and 4.4-fold in female (p = 0.007) diabetic patients compared with that found in non-diabetic subjects. Chest pain symptoms and ischaemic ECG abnormalities were about twice as common among diabetic than among non-diabetic subjects. The frequency of coronary heart disease defined by chest pain symptoms and ECG abnormalities was 3.5 times higher in male (p = 0.001) and 3.1 times higher in female (p = 0.001) diabetic patients than in the respective non-diabetic subjects. The frequency of current digitalis therapy was increased 3.3-fold in male (p = 0.006) and 3.9-fold in female (p = 0.001) diabetic patients suggesting an increased frequency of left ventricular failure among diabetic subjects. The prevalence of hypertension, based on the elevated blood pressure levels and/or current use of antihypertensive drugs, was increased 1.6-1.7-fold among the diabetic patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00276995

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 165

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]23. M.D. academic thesis. University of Kuopio 1983

Authors
Uusitupa, M., Siitonen, O., Aro, A., & Py�r�l�, K.
Affiliations
Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1985-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
22-27
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2075226613
Cited by
165
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, left ventricular failure, hypertension, myocardial infarction, chest pain, electrocardiographic abnormalities, digitalis therapy, middle-aged adults, sex differences, cardiovascular comorbidity
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Digitalis Glycosides, Female, Heart Diseases, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review