The effects of verbal reinforcement of intrinsic motivation for sex-linked tasks
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies have found that positive feedback enhanced intrinsic motivation as mediated by perceived competence.
“Some studies have found that positive feedback enhanced intrinsic motivation as mediated by perceived competence (see, e.g., Blanck, Reis, & Jackson, 1984; Sansone, 1989; Vallerand & Reid, 1984)”
From A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999) · cites this paper as Blanck, Reis, & Jackson, 1984
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Blanck, P. D., Reis, H. T., & Jackson, L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Venue
- Sex Roles
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 369-386
- ISSN
- 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2762
- OpenAlex
- W2000965626
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- surface.syr.edu
- Licence
- Locations
- Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
- Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- verbal praise, intrinsic motivation, gender differences, socialization, self-determination, gender congruence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review